By | 21.09.2019

Advanced SystemCare 12.2.0

User-friendly looks The program adopts a clean feature lineup and organizes its key optimization modules into five categories, namely Care, Protect, Toolbox, Turbo Boost and Action Center. It also reveals a small icon in the main window letting you know the status of your PC health good, fair or bad. You can change the looks of the app by choosing between several themes or adding a custom image from your computer. Tests have shown that the utility scans and repairs system errors very quickly and generates a report including information about the number of solved issues.
advance care antivirus

IObit Advanced SystemCare Ultimate

In truth, there’s a big difference. You can purchase the tune-up utility once and use it for as long as you like, paying again only if you upgrade to a more advanced version. Given the need for constant vigilance and antivirus updates, the subscription model does make sense. IObit’s pricing is in line with competing products.

Webroot costs the same as IObit for three licenses. Please peruse that review for full details of our findings, beyond the summary below. In this review, we’ll focus on the antivirus. Installation is quick and simple. During the install process, both for the tune-up tool and Ultimate, it offered to install adaware web companion.

In both cases, we chose to stick with the product at hand. Some components remain inactive until you turn them on. This last one is interesting.

You configure it to recognize your own face in the webcam, and it warns if it detects an unknown face. Some of these components require a separate download.

Surfing protection is one such; it marks up unsafe links in search results and steers you away from fraudulent phishing websites. When you launch a scan, it looks for startup items, privacy traces, junk files, invalid shortcuts, problems in the registry, and spyware threats.

The product doesn’t clarify precisely what it means by spyware threats. Fixing detected problems can free up disk space and improve performance. Among the other privacy and performance features are: Some were free, which is fine, but we weren’t pleased to find that others required a separate payment. Time tests, detailed in the full review, showed that the tune-up process measurably improved performance. Exercising the test system after tune-up , we found it noticeably snappier.

Advanced SystemCare Pro earned 3. The Ultimate Protection? Installing Advanced SystemCare Ultimate is just as quick and simple as installing the basic tune-up utility. The product uses the same dark blue background, with white text and as-if glowing blue icons. A full scan took one hour and 15 minutes, which is a good bit longer than the current average of about 50 minutes.

However, this product relies on Bitdefender’s engine, and Bitdefender Antivirus Plus took an hour and 16 minutes, so this result is totally consistent. Many antivirus utilities leverage the first full scan to identify safe files, ones that need no further scanning. This kind of optimization can really speed up subsequent scans. A full scan with Norton ran nearly two hours; the repeat scan finished in 15 minutes.

Avast Pro Antivirus went from over an hour the first time to less than a minute on the second full scan. IObit managed a repeat scan in 15 minutes, demonstrating that it does use some form of optimization. We floundered for a bit looking for promised features, especially ransomware protection. We finally realized that clicking the link Protection details displayed nine components. Six of these appeared in the Protect tab in the plain tune-up utility. The Ultimate edition adds Anti-ransomware Engine and Auto-Silent mode, as well as a switch to turn Windows Firewall on if it’s not enabled.

Silent mode suppresses notifications while a full-screen program is active; I’ll discuss ransomware protection below. No Help From the Labs Dedicated researchers at independent testing labs around the world spend their days collecting malware samples and testing various facets of antivirus protection.

We follow four such labs closely: The higher the scores, the better, and the more labs testing a product, also the better. Alas, none of these four directly test IObit. It’s true that IObit uses Bitdefender’s engine, so you might expect it to earn the same great scores that Bitdefender does. However, AV-Comparatives and the other three make one thing very clear. Their results refer to the specific product tested and say nothing about related or licensed versions.

Lab Test Results Chart That’s a completely reasonable position. The company licensing the engine might not use it exactly right, or the licensed engine might not be identical to that of the main product. IObit scored quite differently from Bitdefender in some of our own hands-on tests.

Looking strictly at lab tests, Kaspersky Anti-Virus is the clear winner. All four labs rate Kaspersky top-notch. We use an algorithm to map lab results on to a scale from 0 to 10 and aggregate them.

On that scale, Kaspersky rates a In general, Bitdefender rates right up there with Kaspersky, or very close behind. So-So Malware Protection With no lab reports to go on, our hands-on malware protection tests become more important. For the first test, we start by opening a folder containing the current set of malware samples. Well, usually we open the folder which resides on the desktop. IObit actually started scanning that folder and eliminating known malware before we even opened it.

For individual threats, it popped up a window asking for confirmation to quarantine the threat. The popup also would have let us merely prevent the threat from running, or ignore it, but we always chose quarantine.

When multiple warnings happened at once, IObit displayed the number of threats, with an option to view details. We prefer that treatment of multiple threats to the one-threat, one-popup mode used by Sophos Home Premium and a few others. When the dust settled, IObit had eliminated 82 percent of the samples. Next, we launched the remaining samples and noted IObit’s reaction.

If it did detect malware activity, we used a hand-coded tool to confirm that it fully blocked the malware installation. That confirmation paid off; one sample managed to place numerous malware executables on the test system.

IObit detected 89 percent of the samples and scored 8. Interestingly, the last time we tested an IObit product, using a different set of samples, it detected 89 percent and scored 8. As for comparing those results with other antivirus products, it’s a bit tough, because IObit is the very first product challenged with the current set of samples.

However, Norton, Webroot SecureAnywhere AntiVirus , and Emsisoft all detected percent of the previous sample set, and Norton and Webroot scored a perfect 10 points. Malware Protection Results Chart When it comes to the malicious URL blocking test, the sample sets are always the newest, hence always different. We hit every product with the newest malware-hosting URLs available on the day of the test. To ensure an accurate result, we keep at this test until we have valid results from or more URLs.

If the antivirus steers the browser away from the dangerous URL, we note that behavior. If it kicks in to eliminate the payload during or after the download, it gets equal credit.

If the download completes with no reaction from the antivirus, that’s a fail. Testing this product a couple years ago, we found that the Surfing Protection component blocked exactly one of the more than samples at the URL level, leaving the real-time antivirus to check the downloaded files. This time around, it didn’t block a single URL at the browser level, and only quarantined 61 percent of the downloads.

Clearly, Surfing Protection isn’t part of what IObit licenses from Bitdefender which blocked 91 percent when last tested.

Dismal Phishing Protection If a clever hacker sneaks a data-stealing Trojan past your antivirus and snaffles your passwords, well, there isn’t much you could have done about that.

But if you give away your username and password to a phishing site, that’s totally on you. Phishing fraudsters set up sites that accurately mimic banks, email sites, even dating sites. If they fool you into logging in, they own your account. The Surfing Protection component, also present in the standalone tune-up utility, aims to protect you from making a dreadful mistake on a phishing site.

When it detects you’re about to go where you shouldn’t, it replaces the page in the browser with a big, red warning. You can still proceed to the site, if you insist, but you’ve been warned. Phishing sites are ephemeral, and new phishing techniques appear all the time. Rather than report a hard detection score, we compare each product’s detection rate with other forms of phishing protection.

Symantec Norton AntiVirus Basic has long been a powerful force against phishing, so we include it in the mix. We also test the phishing protection built into Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer. After scraping many suspected fraudulent URLs from websites that collect such things, we power through the list, launching each one in the three browsers and in browsers protected by Norton and by the product under test. If any of them errors out, we discard the URL.

If it’s not truly a phishing site, we discard it, even if one or more products blocked it. Then, with around data points, we run the numbers.

Phishing Protection Results Chart IObit did detect and warn about some of the verified phishing sites, but not many. Its detection rate came in a full 45 percentage points behind Norton. All three of the browsers scored significantly higher than IObit. The lesson is clear; do not turn off your browser’s built-in phishing protection. Trend Micro eked out a 3 percent better detection rate than Norton. And Bitdefender outscored Norton by 12 percentage points.

Shared Tune-Up Features

In truth, there’s a big difference. You can purchase the tune-up utility once and use it for as long as you like, paying again only if you upgrade to a more advanced version. Given the need for constant vigilance and antivirus updates, the subscription model does make sense. IObit’s pricing is in line with competing products. Webroot costs the same as IObit for three licenses.

VIDEO: Advanced SystemCare Ultimate Download – TechSpot

Category: Antivirus; Last Updated: ; File size: MB For Advanced SystemCare, the approach seems to be to try and be a little bit of everything. Advanced SystemCare Free ist eine kostenlose, fähige Suite zur Das Antivirusmodul schützt den Rechner vor Gefahren aus dem Netz und benutzt den auf alle Produktbereiche: Care, Protect, Toolbox, Turbo Boost und Action Center. Download Advanced WindowsCare Personal – Advanced Advanced SystemCare is structured into four sections Care, Toolbox, Turbo.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *